A federal judge questioned whether President Trump might still find ways to pay political allies. The judge had already blocked a controversial compensation fund from proceeding. The remark came during a court hearing on the matter.
The fund was intended to distribute money to supporters of the president. Critics argued it lacked legal justification and proper oversight. The judge sided with those challenging the fund’s legality.
During the hearing, the judge asked whether the administration could use alternative methods. The question suggested concerns that the fund’s purpose might continue through other channels. No specific alternatives were named in court.
Government lawyers defended the fund as a lawful exercise of executive authority. They argued that the president has discretion over certain financial arrangements. The judge pressed them on whether similar payments could be made without the fund.
The case is part of a broader legal battle over executive power and spending. Several groups sued to stop the fund, citing violations of federal rules. The judge’s ruling halted its operations for now.
Legal experts say the judge’s question highlights a key enforcement challenge. Even if one payment mechanism is blocked, others may exist. Courts can only rule on the specific fund at issue.
The hearing did not produce a final decision on alternative payments. The judge asked for more briefing on the scope of the injunction. A ruling is expected in the coming weeks.
