Academics, city leaders, and lawmakers are pushing back against a White House plan to subject federal grants to political review.
Thousands have urged the administration to reconsider the move, which would give officials more control over research funding.
The proposal would allow political appointees to review grants issued by agencies like the National Science Foundation.
Critics argue this undermines scientific independence and inserts partisan oversight into nonpartisan funding decisions.
University researchers warn the policy could chill academic inquiry and delay critical studies on health and technology.
City officials say the change threatens federal support for local infrastructure and public safety programs.
The White House has not publicly responded to the volume of opposition letters and petitions received.
Some supporters of the plan say it ensures taxpayer money aligns with national priorities.
The debate highlights growing tension between executive oversight and scientific autonomy in federal spending.
