A lower court judge has blocked President Trump’s plan to restrict mail-in voting. The ruling came as the Supreme Court weighs the same proposal. It marks another legal setback for the administration’s election policy.
The judge’s order prevents the plan from taking effect while courts review its legality. This decision follows similar rulings in other jurisdictions. Each has found problems with the proposal’s scope.
Trump has argued that mail balloting leads to fraud. Multiple studies and courts have found no evidence of widespread fraud. The plan would impose new ID and verification rules.
The Supreme Court is separately considering whether the plan can proceed. Justices heard arguments earlier this month. A ruling could come before the next election cycle.
Legal experts say the case raises questions about federal power over elections. States traditionally set their own voting rules. The plan would mark a major shift in that balance.
The lower court judge ruled that the plan likely exceeds executive authority. The decision cites harm to voters who rely on mail ballots. It also notes disruption to state election systems.
Both sides have signaled they will appeal. The issue could return to the Supreme Court regardless of the current case. Election officials are preparing for uncertainty.
